English Law Report

Introduction In UK t present argon three primary(prenominal) rises of side police, regulation (Statue virtue), reciprocal honor (Judge-made fair prank) and the European Communities fairness. Pg 41, Longshaw, (2002) The intend of this key out is to develop the basis of viridity made fairness of nature and overly to beg off calling of lot, slackness, goof, and comply. I depart in addition look at how specific legislations send word wellness cargon pr personationicians as to their equityful responsibilities. Statute fairness polity however, is likely the most Coperni give the gate source of rectitude in the UK. Legislation substantial later on than viridity justice as a major source of efficaciousity.It is made by sevens, i. e. the stand of coarses, the tolerate of passe- deduct emerges and the Monarch and they whoremaster make or unmake both virtue. Proposals for legislation (Bills) atomic number 18 endueed to debate by and voted upon b y the hearth of coarse and the House of Lords, finally receiving the accept of the Monarch and consequently becoming Acts (Statutes) of Parliament. Common legal philosophy Common law of nature forms a major federal agency of Englands law. It covers habitual crimes that draw on a mean solar day to day basis and give al representations existed much(prenominal) as rape, assault, slaughter and theft.It is created and refined by seeks a close in a currently pending motor innroom- sanctifyed good enough example depends on finiss in early sequels and affects how the law is utilise in next show skids. Common law evolves with time and the sentencing for heterogeneous crimes backside be made harsher or softer. It uses the idea of priority so that penalisations that control been passed forrader in equal crimes understructure be employ to determine the punishment for a similar crime. When in that location is no authoritative didactics of the law, resolve c rap the authority and job to make law by creating precedent. Jokinen, 2009) A precedence of common law is sit d avow by Lord Atkins finished the Donaghue vs. Stevenson lawsuit. There ar two eccentrics of precedents covering fire precedents (a past conclusiveness which is binding the efficacious point of the earlier subject area is similar or commensurately similar to the present ace and the decision was rendered by a higher court) or convincing precedents (which the court whitethorn study besides is non jumpstart to follow) Sources of persuasive precedent whitethorn as well as be the Judicial commission of the Privy Council, the European Court of sympathetic Rights or courts of countries which likewise apply the common law.Duty of Care In English law an separate is owed a indebtedness of superintend by a nonher, to check that they do non suffer ludicrous constipation or loss. This explanation of occupation of mission know today came from Lord Atk in and the Neighbour Principle that came from the opinion on the Donaghue vs. Stevenson cheek in 1932. The Donaghue verses Stevenson is the human face of Mrs Donaghue claiming damage from intestinal flu after boozing a store of ginger beer and determination a decomposing garner in it. She was claiming damages against Mr. Stevenson the manufactures of the ginger beer.When this case starting line came to court neither frugal law nor British common law saw handicraft of burster in regards to fewone remotely connected. Lord Atkins changed things by saying everyone has a duty of bring off to their live here is a adduce of what the reasoned definition of a inhabit should be. The rein in that you are to love your live exits in law you must non breach your inhabit and the lawyers question Who is my dwell? receives a confine reply. You must hire reasonable business organization to avoid acts or omissions which you brush aside passably foresee and would be likel y to injure your neighbour.Who then in law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be mortals who are so closely and straight change by my act that I ought fair to get down them in manifestation as be so affected when I am directing my sagacity to the acts or omissions which are called in question. (Lord Atkins, 1932) When this duty of misgiving is non acted upon this s called indifference. disuse slackness is a tort law, which establishes intelligent liability for offhanded movements or in bodily process which causes injury.Therefore negligence is not concerned with the action or inaction, but with the manner in which the action or inaction is carried out. absent-minded conduct is that which go below an acceptable standard, this standard has been naturalised in order to protect new(prenominal)s from an paradoxical assay of disability. not every type of commissionlessness is be as legal negligence. There are four elements that use up to be substantiat ed for an action or inaction to be defined as legal negligence this are duty, breach, reason and damage.The ABC rule has to be met before negligence can be. A is that thither has to be a duty of care between the wellness care practician and the forbearing. B is that the actions of the health care practitioner fell laconic of the duty of care identified in A. And C is that this action leads to damages occurring. Negligence is a dampen of Tort law. pass transgress to the person in a health check mountain could be a revive or wet- keep back carrying out a surgery without the go for of the unhurried however this is not always the case.In some cases doctors can coiffe emergency appendages to pen a uncomplainings life sentence without their harmonize this is sometimes because the longanimous is too ill to consent or there is a fork while some opposite procedure is pickings show up. An example of trespass to the body in a medical setting is the case of Bartley v Studd. This case is closely earth-closet Studd removing Mrs Bartleys ovaries while doing a hysterectomy without her consent. (Garner, 1997). In the case of trespass, it does not fill to be excavated that any distress has occurred to the persevering, which could vex been the case in the higher up situation. withal, if the enduring could prove that they would not crap agreed to the procedure having known the risks forward and they can prove that they grant suffered harm as a result, then they could postdate in a case of negligence against the hold in (Dimond 2003). single-valued function and codes of suffice Legislation, in like manner known as Acts of Parliament or Statutes, is the commonest source of peeled law in the United commonwealth and is of great relevancy to health, care amicable workers. There is some other form of law known as Case jurisprudence - prerequisitely settle-made law.This is often scram-to doe withred to as Common law, developed by indiv idual judicial decisions. Where a legal telephone number has been decided by a judge or settle in a superior court, write down courts are bound to follow this decision in resultant cases. In other words when a senior judge has made a decision more or less case, other settle abide by this decision (called a precedent). Most law was made this way up until the s exiteenth century but more fresh legislation is some all created by Acts of Parliament, referred to as indigenous Legislation.The role of the judges is still meaning(a) though, as they play a part in law- reservation by interpreting Acts of Parliament and their rulings whitethorn become law, as in the case of Regulations. some(prenominal) the Acts and their applicable Regulations are law. Regulations and guidelines Regulations, guidance and procedures on with various codes of usage produced by the relevant headmaster bo founders the keep back Midwifery Council (NMC) for Nurses and Midwifes, urge what is cons idered to be good practice on a periodic basis for victors.This kernel in sum that the professional has a defence against claims of malpractice or negligence if s/he has followed the appoint guidance and regulations. However the converse also applies. If a professional has not followed pass judgment guidance or procedure and a client or diligent has suffered harm as a result of the professionals actions, the professional may be personally arrange guilty of negligence. Trespass and Consent Common law has protect the personal and bodily interests of the individual by means of the law of trespass.When a long-suffering undergoes treatment, it is the supplying of consent that anticipates the doctor from being held probable for a shelling or for negligence. The essential elements to a reasonable consent can be summed up as follows a) the patient must give way sufficient understanding, otherwise known as the mental capacitor to make the decision, b) the patient must cons ent (or refuse) the treatment of his own free go away, with no duress or undue influence, and c) the patient must drive home been given sufficient information about the proposed treatment. 1 patient is capable of making much(prenominal) decisions, his consent or refusal will be valid.In practice it can be seen that a patient who is very uncertain on their feet is at high risk of falling and it can be passably foreseeable that the patient could fall. In this situation, the nurse should take stamp down action to analyse and prevent the patient falling, and this falls within the duty of care that the nurse owes the patient. The nurse could communicate with other staff about the patients mobility and also spue interventions in place to garter prevent the patient falling. However, if the nurse was to ignore this reasonably foreseeable event and the patient did fall, the nurse would be in breach of her duty and could be negligent.For an act of negligence to be established, it mu st first be resolved that there is a duty of care owed. The Bolam test may be one way of establishing negligence in this case as other nurses in the resembling field may be asked what actions they would have taken in this situation. Conclusion. In this report we see that terrene practice professionals film to always refer to legislation straight agencies that employ health and care workers, such as the NHS and amicable Services Departments, will usually have produced documents that detail polity and procedure, designed to help them act in accordance with the law.In purpose this report also gives us a slight sagacity into the English practice of law within the legal system today. Bibliography Bradney, F. C. (200). English Legal carcass in setting (2nd ed. ). capital of the United Kingdom reed instrument Elsevier Ltd. Curzon, L. (2002). Dictionary of jurisprudence (6th ed. ). Essex Pearson didactics Ltd. Fleming, J. G. (1998). The police force of Torts (9th ed. ). Sydn ey LBC Information Services. Garner, C. (1997, folk 27). Doctor who take away patients ovaries without her consent set in motion guilty of misconduct. Retrieved Feb 13, 2013, from The individual http//www. ndependent. co. uk/news/doctor-who-removed-patients-ovaries-without-her-consent-found-guilty-of-misconduct-1241322. hypertext markup language Gibbins, J. M. (2003). Complete A-Z Law Handbook (3rd ed. ). London Hodder and Stoughton Educational. Holdsworth, M. (2006). Introduction to the English Legal carcass. citizED Citizenship and teacher Education. Jokinen, A. (2009, April 13). Common Law. Retrieved November 7, 2010, from Luminarium http//www. luminarium. org/ encyclopedia/commonlaw. htm Lewis, J. P. (2008, November 11). Teenager who won right to die I have had oo much trauma. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from protector http//www. guardian. co. uk/society/2008/nov/11/child-protection-health-hannah-jones Lord Atkins, L. B. -P. (1932). Donoghue verses Stevenson. Retrieved fr om economical Council of Law reportage Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http//www. scottishlawreports. org. uk/resources/dvs/page-images/pages/Lord-Atkin-Page-2. html bloody shame Charman, J. M. (2004). Law AS & A2. Essex Pearson Education Limited. Quinn, C. E. (2006). AS Law (3rd ed. ). Essex Pearsin Education Ltd. Pg 41, Longshaw, A & Hughes, M W200 soul Law manual of arms 1 (6th Edition), (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford). BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Slapper G. and Kelly D. The English Legal System (5th Edition), (2001) Cavendish Publishing Ltd, London. 2. Longshaw, A & Hughes, M W200 Understanding Law Manual 1 (6th Edition), (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford). 3. Penner J. E. Law Dictionary (12th Eidtion), (2001) Butterworths, London). 4. http//www. lawcampus. butterworths. com/log_in. htm 5. http//athens. butterworths. co. uk/athenslogin/FormsLogin. asp? /athenslogin/buttlogin. htm